Comparison of Diclofenac Transdermal Patch Against Oral Diclofenac for Pain Control Following Removal of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars: A Systematic Review

Authors

  • S. Deepika Undergraduate (Bachelor of Dental Surgery), Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India
  • S. Sathiyapriya Senior Lecturer, Master of Dental Surgery, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India
  • P. Nimmy Postgraduate (Master of Dental Surgery), Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India
  • D. Prabu Professor and Head, Master of Dental Surgery, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India
  • M. Raj Mohan Reader, Master of Dental Surgery, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India
  • V. V. Bharathwaj Senior Lecturer, Master of Dental Surgery, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India
  • R. Sindhu Senior Lecturer, Master of Dental Surgery, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India
  • Dinesh Dhamodhar Reader, Master of Dental Surgery, Department of Public Health Dentistry, SRM Dental College, Chennai, India

Keywords:

Diclofenac sodium, transdermal patch, third molar surgery

Abstract

Background: Diclofenac sodium is the most prescribed NSAID for postoperative pain management after third molar surgery. It can be administered through various routes. A transdermal patch, one of the newer routes to administer drugs, has fewer adverse effects and better patient compliance. Aim: To assess the effectiveness of a diclofenac transdermal patch against oral diclofenac for postoperative pain management after third molar surgery. Methods: This literature study used PubMed, Elsevier science direct, Wiley online library, Ovid Medline, Cochrane, Prospero, and CINAHL using MeSH terms- diclofenac sodium, transdermal patch, third molar surgery. Of the total 197 articles screened, 113 were full-text articles assessed for eligibility, and 5 were taken for the qualitative analysis. This search was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. In addition, five randomized controlled trials were included in the review process. Results: The transdermal patch was compared with the oral group in all the studies, and the transdermal patch showed statistically significant results compared to the oral route. No Meta-analysis was performed due to clinical heterogeneity and differences in data reporting among the included studies. Conclusion: Transdermal patch was effective in improving postoperative pain and equally effective in the oral group and had lower adverse effects and better patient compliance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

11-07-2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
S. Deepika, “Comparison of Diclofenac Transdermal Patch Against Oral Diclofenac for Pain Control Following Removal of Mandibular Impacted Third Molars: A Systematic Review”, IJRAMT, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 27–30, Jul. 2022, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://journals.ijramt.com/index.php/ijramt/article/view/2256

Most read articles by the same author(s)